Reader Writes May 2023
Here is the only funny thing I have seen so far on a thorny and painful subject. A gay
couple in wedding garb stand outside the Archbishop of Canterbury’s front door. One of
them, finger poised on buzzer, says “Right, we’re agreed, I press the buzzer, then when
the Archbishop opens the door, you sneeze loudly, he then says ‘Bless you’, and we say
‘Amen’; job done!” Rumbling away with gathering storm clouds is the debate within the
Anglican Communion whether same-sex partnerships should be included in the Church’s
teaching and practice of marriage. This was debated hotly at Synod earlier this year, and a
decisive step towards this will be voted on later in the summer. Some claim, especially in
the global south, that changing the orthodox Christian teaching and practice regarding
sexuality would alienate some 75% of the world-wide Anglican Communion.
We all have gay friends and members of our families, so lay people and secular society in
general are usually utterly mystified by the objections that the Church raises. Why on earth
wouldn’t the Church want to bless and spiritually support same-sex relationships in the
same way that it provides for traditional marriage of a man and a woman? At the very
foundation of the Christian’s relationship with God is the confidence and certainty that we
are known and loved by God as individuals, including our sexuality. That ‘expressive
individualism’ seems to cry out for acceptance of the widest range of committed sexual
partnerships.
Jesus found himself in fierce conflict with the Jewish authorities as soon as he began his
public ministry. He was both radically inclusive and he was radically conservative on the
Jewish scriptural norm of marriage. He praised a woman, known to have a sinful
reputation, when she wept over his feet, and pouring a jar of precious ointment over them,
wiped them with her hair. When another woman was brought to him having been caught in
adultery, he neither humiliated her nor condemned her. And again a Samaritan woman
with a shameful reputation was astonished when Jesus asked her for water. Christian
teaching is both these things; radically inclusive but also radically consistent on the norms
of heterosexual marriage.
So where does the individual Christian stand on the blessing of same-sex partnerships?
Many, perhaps most of us, might expect teaching to evolve in response to society’s own
development. At the same time, however, a traditional understanding of scripture says that
marriage was given by God for the union of a man and a woman, and is not extended in
the same way to same-sex partnerships. Living in accord with scripture’s teaching and in
the light of the Church’s tradition, borne out of historical practice, ensures that the Church
(ie believers) continues to walk in God’s will and purpose.
Christians will want to support gay people, and share their pain, when their longings and
commitment to each other are constrained by what the Church legally allows. We pray for
long-term committed relationships pastorally, whether they are within the Church or
outside, whether they are heterosexual or same-sex. This is not the same as changing the
Church’s practice by formally blessing same-sex unions. Christians must listen and hear,
both in terms of care and by taking seriously established orthodoxy.
Robert MacCurrach